science or religion, page-22

Moby,
I agree.

Do you accept that no one should declare the science 'settled' on anything.

Behind this semantic debate, of course, is whether it is legitimate to debate the predominate view on AGW. I am agnostic on the AGW debate, listening to both sides. However I object to the intellectual bullying being used in the debate.

I know you are an AGW supporter from your many posts. I think your side of the debate would be better off engaging the otherside with logic. The tactic of denying your opponents the right to argue their points has now become counterproductive.

bacci