where are we going apg?, page-39

Hi Kevi

When someone pounds away at a point from a biased point of view I sometimes feel the need to give balance. I have posted some very good reasons why such a request as you have made could/should/would be ignored. It would be nice if the directors could respond to every shareholders demands but hypotheticals are in the too hard basket if everyone wants their specific hypothetical answered, especially if they want a personal call back with the information. The danger of that I have already highlighted.

As to automatically defending the company, it certainly cant and shouldn't respond to most of the stuff posted on HC to defend itself but when there is unbalanced critisicm I eventually feel the need to give what I hope is some well considered critique to balance up the opinion.

Buddy however is a well practised stirrer who will change his arguments to make sure he appears correct. I was wondering when he would pipe up. A breath of fresh air if you like well practised classical sophistry (BTW that's a a compliment to Buddy's intellect if you understand what classical sophistry is.)


Cheers

Seik