1) Abbott did not say “I think a lot has changed for the better since then … I think the indigenous people of Australia can be very proud of the respect in which they are held by every Australian … I think it probably is time to move on from that.”
2) Either a Labor staffer OR an Union Head Official turn the previous statement into That Abbott wants the Embassy to Move On
3) A Labor staffer thought it was wise to provide the whereabouts of Abbott
4) That Gillard stated A recipient of a medal requested to redo the presentation because of the commotion and banging on the windows
5) That Gillard's bodyguards thought it was wise to remove themselves from the situation
Personal comment - What situation - The media beat-up?
6) That Gillard thought that it was wise to offer assistance to Abbott to remove him also from the situation
Personal comment - What situation - The media beat-up?
7) The look on Gillard's face as she was fleeing the media beat-up. Oops, I mean the situation
8) That Gillard removed herself from any implication of being involved in the situation.
Personal comment - What situation - The media beat-up
9) The Labor staffer who whether pushed or walked resigned from his post. The post I suspect he would have worked long and hard for. Because of what? The media beat-up.
If this was just a media beat-up, why would a media savy representative of our Prime Minister have to resign?
This happened so fast, the resignation, I don't even think the media had had a chance to beat it up.
You guys need to pick what side of the argument you want, and then stick to it. You can't have both sides. Julia looked like she was fearful of something. What was it?
