desired outcomes, page-36

HappyDays - I see you went to the same school of optimism as me!! I hope whoever suggested they had contacted ASIC about the default notice from Tefler not being announced - has in fact done so! THAT is criminal. I would be very interested to know the date of that notice. I wonder if it may have been around when the stock started slipping? *sniff sniff* Smells a little bit putrid??

Debono - you are very well written & all sensible suggestions.

I would also like to see a board that is paid on performance & so have a vested interest in the company's growth & success. Ours must be the only rig in Oz/globally that isn't earning income!! Imho - the dry hire contract (if the parties were prepared to negotiate on terms) would have allowed WS to take on the risk of proving the rig (at his cost)and give ckk the opportunity to move into manufacturing as per the IP agreement.

I think we can agree Cygnet will have nothing to do with WS so it is unlikely any of this will go the way the majority of smaller holders would like but it would be nice to know if they have any interest in this little company succeeding at all!

Surely there are enough holders to make up 5% to call an EGM. Except for Cygnet & the current board, surely there can be no other holders that would want to keep the status quo?? (I'm guessing unless they didn't get their shares through parting with their hard earned)?

___________________________________________________________

be kind...I'm new here