Paul100 - I think I mentioned this last time. No comparison. Even iat it nadir, ROC had valuable assets and cashflow to cover debts. ROC story is a story of early success, lots of funds and management with a very agressive attitude. New management have changed this approach and what we now have is a company with good assets, amazing cash flow and a disciplined measured strategic approach. The other company you refer to has had no success, earned nothing, raised multiples of todays market cap and still are in a situation were there survival is in balance .
This is what I have never understood when people invest on companies so close to the edge - there are so many stocks with great upside and much lower risk, why choose one where you can lose your capital in quest for that great return. Infact the upside you suggest the other stock has is not even unique. ROCs consesus valuation provide the same upside from my current entry price.
I have said it before , I don't want to see you lose any money, and you may infact do well, but from a risk reward there is yry no comparison with ROC which has great core value, great cash flow and great upside
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
