email exchange with michael, page-86

Abdm - thanks for your reply. I agree only partly with what you say. The part that is factual - clippings from articles, etc. The rest, especially where you analyze the emails and pass judgements takes away all the positive of the nature of your reply. Eg you made a big point around my mail where Michael empathized with me around declining sp. I wrote this mail on a general tone of his mail, did not reproduce it. If I told you he empathized with me around declining sp, but also wrote he is NOT worried about short term sp decline, which he did, will that completely change your opinion. I think you have to understand what matters are more important than others and do not extrapolate on trivial things. I don't think you are very serious - if you were you wouldn't be spending your time trying to incorrectly interpret other people mail contents rather talking to the man itself. Why have you never emailed Michael yourself, has that never occurred to you or you have but not sharing with us. As I have said, it is very to bash a speccy. We need to ask questions, get involved, act as checks - but within the domain of a speccy, not a blue chip. I am not saying anything or everything is good, but there is a chance things could work out. And I evaluate this for myself and am sure others would be doing for themselves. So I would suggest to get in touch with Michael and decide your path. That would serve you and me more good. Best of luck in your due diligence.