as pointed out before:
Voting on sale of ML occurs before spill motion voting
So - if the guys seeking the spill motion can't be bothered to contact SH with their intentions and communicate clearly how they see the future and progress at BCN:
Will they be any better than current management who has also kept us in the dark and not followed thru' on time-lines and promises ?
I would have thought to get to their goal they would have to clearly spell out their plans to SH in a letter to be able to "change the RMS contract" as this is voted on well before the spill motion
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?