chart, page-64

Jayson, apologies for not addressing your comments sooner. I’ve had you on ignore for quite some time now. I made the mistake of bringing you back to get some context on another post. My bad.

I would very much enjoy detailing my background and experience, but I cherish my anonymity far more than I would take pleasure in proving your assessment wrong.

You are correct that my view of the ML trading halt is not a conviction. I wished only to state that the trading halt seemed odd to me and that it would not surprise me if the ML grant was a condition precedent to releasing a greater announcement (good or bad). I may be proven wrong that the ML grant (not the ML offer) is a condition, but I’m not sure how my view represents a conspiracy theory. Mgmt did state that they are busy taking "steps to satisfy conditions precedent in accordance with a settlement between the parties".

FYI 1 - In this electronic age, signatories do not need to be in the office to review/authorise a release...especially a one page ML offer release.

FYI 2 – important announcements are normally written well in advance with the assistance of a PR rep and depending on the content, a legal advisor as well. If you wish to corroborate this fact I can give you the name of a great PR rep in the mining industry.

I agree with your assessment of AGS being a buy, and...ignore.