BTA 0.00% 57.0¢ biota holdings limited

other players, page-10

  1. 605 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 46
    CG,
    Thanks for the reply. I would hope that BTA have the safety issues covered. If they have, its not in the public domain. Why not? There is no published peer-reviewed science by BTA or others - independent or otherwise - to verify safety.

    Compare the tone of the 2003 plecondaril clinical trial report here:
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12802751.1
    And the subsequent FDA slap-down here:
    http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/37/12/1722.1.long

    From the trial: ....."Early pleconaril treatment was well tolerated and significantly reduced the duration and severity of colds due to picornaviruses in adults......."
    .....Sounds a lot like the BTA press release......
    Several companies did their money trying to get plecondaril approved for prevention or therapy for rhinovirus. I'd like to see the safety issues addressed before we spend any more money progressing this drug. Or, get it licensed out ASAP and have big pharma address the safety issues. I just hope we don't have another plecondaril. I have no confidence in these press releases.
    Slab

 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add BTA (ASX) to my watchlist

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.