XXWW and ZED. The argument about the JORC and native copper cannot be proved nor disproved until mining starts and while we can, and probably will, continue arguing it seems that you two do not listen to explanations put forward by the company or as you like to describe them the "the CDU cheer squad".
Firstly if you believe(after all the explanations) the Jorc is correct and it describes the amount of copper at Rocklands accurately then fine thats it, no further argument, end of story. However if you have listened as I have to talk of drilling pushing large NC nuggets aside, the native copper being ignored in estimates or underestimated then it goes by extension to explaining why the DFS has not been produced ( the DFS will not give an accurate estimate of feasibility or profitability).
Finally I don't claim to be an expert at all on whether the above is true or not but the three major shareholders who have joined the registry ( who have bought generally well above the market price) tell me that people more expert than me ,or daresay you two, believe that copper is in much greater quantity than the Jorc suggests.
So I am going to ask you two a question neither of you has ever addressed and that is why are these three cornerstone investers would bother with such an unspectacular deposit as Rocklands if they believe what you obviously do.
Come on, you are good at asking questions (and often ridiculing those who offer an explanation)but can you answer this simple one.
I for one don't mind you asking all your questions but please try to listen and answer the one question which makes CDU, to me, almost as sure a thing as you can get on the stockmarket If I was able I would buy more and more and more right up until the time they start mining.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?