bb is ba, page-129

george
twinning some rc holes with ddhs and applying a conversion factor wouldnt cost millions and as a non holder i dont really care financially.. Current shareholders would benefit if the ddhs showed a big xx% discrepancy if it were on the upside wouldnt it??? If it didnt really make much difference and the myth was busted then it would possibly hurt shareholders??

as for native copper its not unique... but a lot of deposits have had it mined out by the old timers as it tends to be at the top of the deposits near surface. Old timers just missed it at rocklands it seems. Generally its a pain in the butt to process which may be the reason other companies dont highlight it??

i dont have time to give you lots of examples...i understand roseby has a fair bit as one example and although not as coarse as LM ...recovery is reduced i recall from their releases, and sulphides are much better generally

xx