new board., page-3

George you speak some absolute tripe in here. You have got a shocking case of verbal diarrohea. I don't think we need to go through a big debate why Russell left the company. Personal reasons were stated and that will suffice for me. Regardless of the reasons for him leaving, he has now gone and will need to be replaced. As for supporting Rodd and the company, it should solely be based on their past performance. For a multitude of reasons they, IMO have performed poorly. Lumacom management will have succeeded in my mind when:
Turkey has got a constant and decent revenue stream
New York has an advertiser and the sign is viable
Lumacom are able to put 2 more signs up and make them viable within 1 year.
Yes Rodd has worked very hard and is dedicated but success is what we have to judge him on and based on what the MARKET knows, this has been very limited.
Rhetoric is not enough to pull this company's share price out of the hole, but when decent ann's get released, money will be piled into this company and I for one will significantly increase my investment in it. Some of the top 20 have significant cash reserves and are quite wealthy people and I'm sure will support and company which looks like its about to succeed.