Hi Tony,
many thanks for the reply! :-) I understand now, it seems to be the valuations/NPV were more about showing that the transaction will get PLV all the infrastructure for Irvine and not end up costing us anything (actually making us something) - even when using very conservative numbers.
Cheers,
StatsMan
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PLV
- questions 1st june 2012
questions 1st june 2012, page-26
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 19 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)