brainy, page-8

Ah, classic Boiler, the old rifle through old posts caper.
Knew that was coming.

I was new to the sharemarket, not human nature, Boiler.
I've never professed to be a technical analyst, and have never been shy of asking for input and clarification from the many contributing chartists. I've been grateful for their teachings.

I've never doubted your technical skills nor your ability to make money.
But my understanding is much greater on the fundamental side and that's where I have taken the time to provide explanations or positive interpretations of the information you skew to seem negative (without fail since you sold). Whether though implication or selective context, it's clear you're painting the company and the prospects of CVac to be poor.
If you really believed that you wouldn't be wasting your time here, warning us all.
A technical guru such as yourself would be looking for stocks that are in or are about to enter an uptrend. If CVac was a failure, then PRR won't be going up.
Could it fail? Yes.
I'm well aware of the risks and will take it on the chin if that eventuates and you can be as smug as you like and repaste my posts to prove how wrong I was.

Or you could buy in, start being positive again and we both get rich and laugh about how you tried to bag CVac to buy in cheaper.

By they way, I've averaged down considerably, even been stopped out a few times (egad!) and bought in cheaper.
So I'm not losing any sleep. But thanks for your concern.