Don't think they've released the ACTUAL DFS report.
The 2006 DFS Ann & the recent 2012 DFS Ann were just brief summaries/highlights of the actual DFS. I would really like to have an insightful read of the actual 2006 & 2012 DFS. Maybe then the comparison will become clear.
I just assumed that taking away CAPEX was always included in the calculation of NPV
$28 Million (2012) vs $88 Million (2006) seems nowhere close.I know CAPEX has increased by somewhat 24.5 Million
$70 Million (2012) vs $45.5 Million (2006) BUT that still doesn’t justify SUCH a big difference between the two NPV values.
One of the earlier Ann this year also suggested an “Addition of $7 Million/year over life of mine per each additional 1% of tungsten recovered.
There's got to be some sort of explanation of the NPV difference.
Just my thought
Kiddo
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- THR
- 2006 npv vs 2012 npv
THR
thor energy plc
Add to My Watchlist
11.1%
!
1.0¢

2006 npv vs 2012 npv, page-2
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
|
|||||
Last
1.0¢ |
Change
0.001(11.1%) |
Mkt cap ! $7.107M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
1.0¢ | 1.0¢ | 1.0¢ | $199 | 19.9K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
7 | 2076720 | 0.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.0¢ | 470111 | 5 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
7 | 2076720 | 0.009 |
8 | 1709333 | 0.008 |
6 | 1643979 | 0.007 |
5 | 1006833 | 0.006 |
2 | 577727 | 0.005 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.010 | 470111 | 5 |
0.011 | 6231 | 1 |
0.012 | 1643871 | 6 |
0.013 | 200000 | 1 |
0.014 | 255000 | 1 |
Last trade - 10.43am 24/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
THR (ASX) Chart |