"co-incidences"..?, page-186

MB

It's irrelevant where the CHTD demo plant is built. Just because it may not be "smack bang in the middle of BM" (just for you A ;o) - doesn't mean they are not committed to the BM project.

Exergen will project manage BM once JORC ann'ed - so how is that not committing to BM?

Exergen are going to pay $500K as half the BM exploration costs - so how is that not committing to BM?

Exergen will recieve 1 bill tonnes of BM BC - so how is that not committing to BM?

Exergen have stated that they would build a slurry pipeline out of LV and a proposed CHTD plant close to port. Just because the CHTD plant is not in LV doesn't mean they won't commit to LV.

You see DC, this is the advantage of CHTD - it doesn't need to be in a specific place to work - anywhere you can dig a hole deep enough will suffice probably.

Coldry on the other hand has no choice but to be in the vicinity of a power plant, so must be in the LV. Does that make ESI more "committed" to LV or more "dependent" on LV to work?

One is an independent tech, the other is Coldry.

Moot point, but nice try anyway.

Cheers K