price target after trading halt, page-70

Lol, every one knows that RB, but the qn was if AAM only owned 51-60% of the tenements as per the above announcement, I dont follow from whom they bought, or where the original announcement got varied so that they can now own 75%, because AAM per the announcements details did not own 75%. This is convusing, as I cannot see how KAB could own more % than what AAM owned originally, without another deal.

I am trying to get my head around this, thus the qn. At the moment it does not make logical sence to me.