is Mitsubishi-UFJ supporting the compulsory acquisition or else holding a 17% stake with the intention of blocking compulsory acquisition? just a thought!
the big money interests are certainly really getting into the swing of things here - would that be because Ballarat is a highly desirable asset?
Ann: Change in substantial holding , page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)