surveillance team, page-10

... agreed ... why the mods decided to ban the thread and not many others on HC which have been much more nasty is beyond me ... our thread did not have anything particularly damaging on it other than usual banter ... unfortunately there were a lot of other good points made on that thread which are now lost ... I hope the mods either reinstate the whole thread or at least reinstate it with the actual offending comment(s) modded out ...

... always a worry when a company interferes with basic freedom of speech! ... now makes one think what else have they got to hide ... a more suitable approach is if the company just simply clarified the situation ... I have my own suspicions as to what it was about (viz: the certain 'alleged incestuous company relationships') ... this has been an ongoing issue for some months (possibly a year or two??) now ... I say again that a simple clarification is all that is necessary ... can't detail more on here as this post might get modded too but regular posters/lurkers on here will know what I am referring too ... after all the suggestions are ONLY ALLEGED ... I am not accusing anybody of any impropriety ... but as shareholders/ interested parties surely we are allowed the courtesy to publicly question or raise such possible relationships without the fear of retribution ...