what the...some buying !, page-11

imo nathan, the opposite would have occurred, it would have fallen faster. cos fundamentals were still poor throughout. and a 2nd or 3rd consol would have ensued.

i saw that kind of example on anoter LJC stock with a 2nd consolodation occurring. i saw example of a 120fold decline in real terms, in adddition to obsene dilution i think in one stock.

If the LJC deal terms were seen out the 3 years, well it may have recovered faster too i guess. but a faster recovery from a 120fold decline well isnt much to rave on about? incidentally i didnt see any awesome recoveries in some of the other LJC stocks i reviewed.

not so bad for a new buyer if fundamentals come good.. but a walloping for the old horses on the track imo. im just glad its over now with only minor collateral damages at INT by comparsion to some other LJC victims in AUST.