referral to ema, page-51

post number 8448819 is by Senoj. Your post 8446246 about cash spend may have been taken seriously if you had not included your continual criticism. The stock held is most likely to be only from the production run required for approval. It is unlikely they would have produced extra stock when they were so worried about the use by date that they delayed the submission for approval. This, in hindsight, was a bad decision and may end up costing more than money they thought they would saved but was done with the best of intention.