It's silly how they say 'actual price recieved' for RIO/BHP but then contrast that with 'all in costs' for AGO/FMG.
Based on UBS saying BHP/RIO actually recieve $73 a ton which gives them a $40 and $34 margin wouldn't that mean their 'all in cash costs' are only $33 and $39. Which would mean AGO/FMG are producing at an all in cash cost that is more than double that of RIO/BHP.
Or have they just not bothered to mention the all in cash costs for RIO/BHP?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AGO
- analyst comments
analyst comments, page-44
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AGO (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
FHE
FRONTIER ENERGY LIMITED
Adam Kiley, CEO
Adam Kiley
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online