AGS alliance resources limited

marp, page-109

  1. 8,042 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 436
    TL

    It appears from S.Johnson that the CClause applys to all details re B4M.

    I was of the opinion that it applied to the Court Matters?

    MARP would come under the everyday running of the Company imo and be subject to ASX disclosure rules.Theres no reason why Management couldn't give details of where MARP is at, to Shareholder's enquiries.imo

    and IF the CClause applies to everything then Shareholders will never know the outcome of any settlement/Court findings.imo

    ie Any buyout by H/Q (the amount/terms for what percentage?).Any buyout by Itochu,if they link with H/Q(amount/terms/percentage).
    With any Court imposed findings,ÁGS shareholders/ASX will not know what AGS actually has as far as B4M goes and what was imposed on H/Q.

    A rediculous situation and that is if the Court finds in favour of AGS with anything other than the return of the entire asset.imo

    IF AGS lose theres no point in keeping B4M.imo

    Win,lose or draw,get it over and done with!

    At the least its a learning curve for Management from their dealings with the BB.lol

    Invest in shares,yeah sure.lol

    Md



 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.