to all:

AS A SHAREHOLDER,LIKE MANY OF YOU, FOLLOWER OF MST SINCE THE 90'S AND A FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTOR TO THE "PINDER BID"

I HAVE SPENT CONSIDERABLE TIME ACTIVELY CONTRIBUTING TO THE "PINDER" CAUSE, & CONSIDERABLE TIME IN DISCUSSION WITH THOSE ALIGNED WITH ACTIVELY SAVING MST.
TO PUT AN END TO MOST OF THE SPECULATION AND 2ND GUESSING THAT GOES ON , ON THIS POST AND TO MAKE IT AS CLEAR AS POSSIBLE THE POSITION OF THE POSTS BY RECENT COMMENTS HERE.
FACT: IF THE PINDER BID FAILS "ALL" SHAREHOLDERS WILL GET "NOTHING" YOUR INVESTMENT WILL BE "GONE" FOREVER !THERE WILL BE "NO" AUSTRALIAN COMPANY THAT WE HAVE AN INTEREST IN REAPING ANY BENEFIT FROM THE PROGRESSION OF THIS TECHNOLOGY IN THE U.S.A. "FULL STOP"
ONE RECENT CONTRIBUTOR ON THIS SITE IS SIMPLY SCAREMONGERING TO DISSUADE ANY POTENTIAL INTEREST AND FUNDS TO KEEPING THE COMPANY.
THE "BULLETED" QUESTIONS RECENTLY POSTED ,WHILE OBVIOUSLY EDUCATED, AND DO MAKE A COUPLE OF VALID POINTS, ARE BOTH MISLEADING AND "VERY" OUT OF DATE!
THE STRUCTURE OF THE REVISED DOCA HAS EVOLVED WAY PAST THAT WHICH THIS RECENT ENTRANT IS ALLUDING TO, AND BEYOND JUST "SHAREHOLDER " CONTRIBUTIONS.
SUFFICE TO SAY , THEY ARE DESIGNED TO CAST DOUBT AND HALT ANY FURTHER HOPE "SHAREHOLDERS" MAY HAVE. I WON'T BE DRAWN INTO PICKING PIECEMEAL HIS POINTS APART.
=JUST READ THEM FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF A PLOY BY AN "UNFRIENDLY"
OF COURSE THE REVISED POSITION OF THE "PINDER " DOCA WON'T BE DISCLOSED PUBLICLY ......... SERIOUSLY WOULD YOU LAY YOUR CARDS ON THE TABLE IN A POKER GAME . THERE IS A LOT AT STAKE HERE, AS MOST WILL KNOW !
It's not a 2 bit suburban card game!
PUT SIMPLY: 2 PARTIES ARE VYING FOR THIS COMPANY AND WINNER TAKES ALL!

BOTTOM LINE:
SEE WHAT FUNDS YOU MAY HAVE OR KNOW OF THAT WOULD CONTRIBUTE TO MAKING A DIFFERENCE AND SEE US MOVE FORWARD AS I BELIEVE PAST THIS CURRENT DILEMMA (BROUGHT ON BY A HOSTILE) AND THEN ONTO PRODUCTION .THE MORE THE FASTER

OR

...... DO NOTHING AND INCREASE THE CHANCE OF LOSING THE LOT

GOODNU