setting the record straight, page-6

Andy,you seem to know your stuff
and as I am but a humble debt collector
(my speciality being collecting from Macquarie!!!)
what is the average time between the completion of the trial and the peer review,and between the peer review and the submission to a journal and between the submission to a journal and the publication of the article???

Regarding the 1052 MPC articles,are you saying that we should disregard them because they were not submitted by MSB,or are you saying that they are irrelevant because they were written in before a certain time?at which point in time should we start taking medical research seriously (clearly you are not happy with material submitted in or prior to 1924 )!

The real point is which the best stem cell?(stro 1?)who owns it?(I know the answer to that one -MSB)and what is the competition doing (I know the answer to that on too -very little),who is doing MSB's research (the best universities and medical schools in the world,and the brightest medical minds are leading the trials)which stem cell company has 200 mil in the bank?(i think you know the answer to that one !!)
which company will soon have 4 blockbuster products in phase 3(everybody knows that one!!! )and you can publish and peer review all you want but its the FDA which decides if you go to market and its the big Pharmas that open their wallet and put 1.7 bil on the table AND PAY FOR THE TRIALS.

in my humble opinion this is like nothing i have ever seen before (name one Australian company that has ,had or will have 4 phase 3 blockbuster product ) some people invest in vaginal creams (spl),and there is nothing wrong with that (i'm sure that if successful it will make a better for world),but Mesophiles only invest in MSB .
Watch out Macquarie ,i have a long memory and I WILL COLLECT !!!
dyor
"I SHOP THEREFORE I AM !!!! " barbara kruger
P.S.(HOW GOOD WERE THE SWANS?)