AEJ redbank energy limited

too many shareholders

  1. 1,628 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 66
    Having read through the Annual report I was knocked off my seat when I realised that there are 17,702 shareholders for a company with a market cap of only $4.6m. Whats more there are 17,268 shareholders holding unmarketable parcel's of shares less than 89 for a total of 90,511.

    Surely this number of shareholders is costing AEJ in managing its registry.

    I think its appropriate that the board buy's these shareholders out. The cost would not be more than $700k which is less than what they have saved in interest from last year based on reducing the debt.

    One would think the banks would be support of this for a number of reasons;
    1. It reduces the ongoing costs for AEJ
    2. It simplifies and stream lines the number of shareholders
    3. It would take a step closer to making AEJ a more attractive takeove target

    The benefit for the shareholders is that if done properly they can realise the investment without a transaction fee where as if they sold on market they cost would be huge. I have watched as parcel's of 1 to 31 shares have traded on adaily basis.
    At least if the board gives these shareholders the opportunity it would be good for all!
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.