are weg pulling their weight?, page-86

Great point phantom. On reflection, most of SH are battered and bruised and are at an emotional state that would almost accept anything provided it keeps the company afloat. The bar has been set low in regards to expectations for PLV. As Humble mentions, it might be safest to vote Yes as safety is in the minds of most of the investors following our near death experience. On the other hand Phantom, if we vote NO and plv hits hurdles, would we rue this AGM. I for one would prefer to rue this AGM and the vote when we come to Irvine. Why? because it means we are at Irvine. Keep in mind, PLV is still very high risk. Feasibilties need to be done at cockatoo and after irvine i am just a bit nervous about our forecasts. So i will vote yes, knowing that management recommends it and it decreases our risk.