I was a 100% YES until Tony explained the situation. I'd just assumed that penalties would apply for a NO vote. As Tony explains it, only refunding the $3mil is an excellent outcome should the motion be rejected. But obviously their is still Irvine to contend with.
But this has bought time, and one wonders if a NO vote and producing Cockatoo might increase the sp enough to make other options available.
It was defiantely a great question by Humble and and excellent and comprehensive answer by Tony.
Now we have the facts and we decide for ourselves. Probably I'll just support the company recommendation. But I can see justification for NO.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PLV
- are weg pulling their weight?
are weg pulling their weight?, page-104
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add PLV (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online