And herein lies my questions to Ms. Gillard then, she who now likes to present and portray herself as OUR keeper of high standards or morals and social mores - and someone high above us all - who looks down her nose and has the gall to look affronted if challenged - on anything - and the utter gall to keep trying to ruin the Abbott family reputation with VILE defamation! She now sees herself as "The Untouchable". And is laughing in all our faces in private, I'm sure.
Does she deem it OK to have had affairs with not one, but TWO married men, as on public record, both fathers of young children at the time, allegedly breaking up at least one of these marriages?
Events she willingly indulged herself in on her journey up to the high office of Prime Ministership? Yet not doesn't bat an eyelid about - yet has the temerity to question the Abbott personal character?
Worse, she presumes to rail at and lecture and screech abuse publicly at her political opponent across the Parliament making foul allegations about HIS standards of behaviour - a total malicious invention, which SHE has gone on to perpetuate (more lies, in other words) invented, out of sheer personal spite, entirely UNTRUE - just to prop up her own wobbly position. No seeing herself as some stupid "Titter" heroine!
She also having proceeded down what many of us saw, with huge embarrassment and disbelief, a blatant and in-our-faces flirtation trail with regard to HER behaviour whenever she was around the presence of the President of the United States when we hosted him a few months ago - digraceful blatant inapproriate behaviour most of us watched in sheer disbelief? Including Mrs. Obama, I suspect. Gillard's (alleged) deliberate flirting could NOT be written off by her, as it usually is, by - I was (just) "young and naive?" It looked blatant and deliberate.
Further, could SHE provide us with the proper dictionary classification of the appropriate word applicable (NOT from a manipulative Macquarie Dictionary, please Ms. Gillard!) the classification of women who set out to have affairs (plural), knowingly, WITH married men, childless or otherwise?
WHAT is THAT word - a "Misogynist" being a hater of women - then what's the similar word for females with NO regard for possible outcomes for the wives and children of the married lovers they take?
Home-wrecker, perhaps?
IN the USA, a distinguished and hugely admired public figure, having given 37 years of distinguished public service to his country, in war and peace, has just had the decency and guts and CLASS to resign when the truth emerges! And this is only ONE instance of his personal failing.
Yet Ms. Gillard, two years in the job, no distinguished war service, and having had TWO affairs with married men, has the above on HER CV, yet still got the top job? And that's before anyone starts to scrutinise the current heavy allegations now raging around aspects of her former career as a seniorlawyer/partner whilst at Slater and Gordon!
Yet glued on Lefties keep finding excuses for her, are happy that THEIR leader stays on, whatever the true nature of her character and past behaviour, keep their boots well into an innocent Abbott, ignoring these episodes above being established fact. And then there's the added black clouds of public suspicion, now, engendered by the above allegations.
In my opinion, this is a Prime Minister totally unworthy of the office, or deserving of any modicum of a right to public respect.
How long will this charade of "retain Gillard at any cost so Labor can survive" charade continue. We, as citizens have the right to ask:-
1/ WHY are the mainstream Press giving her such a kid-glove "ride?" (Does she have them terrified of the media regulations she, Swan and Brown, threatened? Are continuing to threaten? Or is it that the majority of their journos are ALL blatantly heavily Left Wing! Not uttering one peep of criticism? Oakes and Grattan being two of the worst!
2/ WHY is it taking this hugely (interminable) time to INVESTIGATE serious and dire allegations brought against one Craig Thomson. Further, in the case of Ms. Gillard, why are we not hearing the actual truths of the events which happened during her employment at Slater and Gordon? SOMETHING is not right here - there's the heavy whiff now of being able to allege there may be, at many unknown top leves, State or Federal, IMO, deliberate stallings, selective time wastings, deliberate destruction of evidence, heavy and secret and even criminal witness intimidation, and out and out political and departmental failures to adhere to the highest standards of prompt law enforcements and deliberate obfuscations and legal network corruptions. Alleged - but in my opinion now, given this inexplicable lapse of time, and NO action, all allegations a very real possibility of being fact!
That "she" stood in Parliament that day - jumping to her feet, completely OFF topic (as HER Speaker, Anna Burke WELL knew, but allowed regardless, (how can that lady sleep well at night?) and launch into that vicious and spiteful RANT and litany of lies, letting the REAL misogynist, Slipper, off the hook, to thrive and survive as HER minion, and putting her dirty boots into Mr. Abbott in such vile fashion, yes, her attack would be HUGELY defamatory OUTSIDE those cushy walls - and then have the gall to go along with the resultant misguided "admirations" gushed at her by silly ignorant (or agenda driven) women, is beyond my comprehension. Conclusion - she'll stop at nothing to survive.
Silly Tony Windsor now calling for a Royal Commission into the Catholic Church and the abuses of children.
Suppose he feels THAT would be a good diversion from this HUGE elephant in the room pertaining to the true nature of the Gillard character and reputation and the question now of her moral and ethical suitability for the post she holds - but, always the arch hypocrite, he's looking the other way over THAT one!
WHY cannot Slater and Gordon be forced to publicly reveal, NOW, the full transcript of exactly WHY they (as alleged) sacked MS. Gillard at that time - and then kept it all hushed up? Many now making many allegations agianst many entities, allegations of deliberate cover-ups, avoidance, and deliberate destruction of vital evidence with regard to the many persons who were involved in these events at that time, from many entities, including, of course, Unions.
God forbid, do these alleged cover-ups, etc. have tentacles reaching up into the higher levels of our national lawmakers and investigative departments? Look aways - for political expediency?
As a supposedly TOP law firm at that time (champions of the "little man - and heavily Labor influenced) - surely Gillard's former employers, men and women, have records of what went on when she was called in to answer serious questions? And they should be willing to reveal same?
A Royal Commission on WHY these issues are seemingly and allegedly being covered up for political expediency reasons should be called, immediately!
I, for one, have no respect for this woman whatsoever, starting with the affairs with married men" basis first up. One instance - bad! Two instances - absolutely pathetic. Anyone even follow up on how the affected children are coping today? Women's Weekly perhaps? Some personal yarns from the aggrieved wives as to how THEIR lives are going now? (Pigs'll fly!)
Like the four Pink Batts young who tragically died thanks to Rudd/Gillard's mad scheme, no one, least of all Ms. Gillard, I'd allege, gives a darn about those two affected families either. Yesterdays fish and chips!
Finally, I also heavily criticise the fact that her political "mate", one Joan Kirner, ex (un-elected) Premier of Victoria, was awarded Australia's highest honor, an Order of Australia, in the last Queens Birthday Honors list! Blatant "let's reward our mates" stuff, I allege. Kirner was most unpopular, messed up Victoria entirely is the allegation and view of many, and it was SHE who introduced heaps more pokie machines into the State, which then stopped Victorians flocking to the NSW border to paly the pokies. BUT - it was Joan Kirner who "rescued" Gillard after she'd been unemployed, allegedly for sic months, after Slater and Gordon had (allegedly) sacked her - Kirner who got her a job as a chief of staff to John Brumby, eventual Victorian Premier. The man Baillieu defeated. Gillard then won pre-selection for Lalor, and so her climb started. She never ever bothered to renew her licence to practice law. Why not, we might well ask? She was a Partner at Slater and Gordon - so surely she valued her legal career and would have kept it as a possible future alternative again, had things in politics not worked out. SO what - Kirner gets a top gong - for her leg-up" of Gillard, post alleged sacking? We must then start to question the motives behind the awarding of these Australian "Honors" - just WHO is getting them - and on WHAT basis? Or are many of them "medals" for the "boys" - or the "girls"!
I see it an a personal insult that this woman is still being regarded, by anyone, as a suitable Prime Minister of Australia.
Apologies for length - but these things have to be said. WHILST we still have a democracy - a fast receding prospect, I allege, under this existing, now, divisive and iron rule.
These are serious worries - it's the rapidly falling standards of our so-called Parliamentary democracy and the integrity of our law makers and law enforcers which is at stake here.
Many now feel that Parliament has now sunk to such low levels of the flauntings of required behavior, and the vicious personal attacks masquerading as debate Labor now do daily, that it will never again be possible to lift its standards and reputation once more.
Sad thing is - Australia once stood proud. And we were proud. Not anymore.
