Very interesting. I'm not sure how comparable the development of the two wells is though. I'm fairly confident that the frac carried out on Ray #6 is much more substantial than that carried out on Ray #5 from what I've read, and the last report noted flowback at a "very high rate", compared with Cozart which simply noted flowback.
I actually thought the last report was less encouraging for Cozart, and wasn't too worried about Ray #6. I wasn't looking at it from your angle though, but I'm not sure what management have to gain from delaying the announcement of flowback rates. If they're stalling so that Ray #6 results which are below expectations can be released at the same time as Cozart results which are aobve expectations, I'm not sure why they'd currently be reporting flowback at a "very high rate". I'd expect them to be watering down our expectations at least slightly at this point.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?