It can be argued that IG did not do his Due Diligence when going to bed with the BB.
Would AGS not have given 75% if they were told there is uranium? It doesn't make sense.
BB may have been mislead AGS in what's in the ground but that doesn't change their entitlement, IMO.
At the end of the day, AGS did sign on the dotted line.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AGS
- my investment in i.gandel
my investment in i.gandel, page-21
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 26 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
RNU
Renascor wins a funding boost given it wants to produce a critical mineral – but $5M award pales in comparison to some
TLX
Telix jumps 11.6% as US government indicates proposed medicare changes won't affect prostate cancer drug