campaign against sundance, page-13

You sound desperate Baukaw

Thanks for recognising my post, and casting judgement on those who thumbed it. I just wanted to highlight 65 cents without Hanlong is a possibility given developing circumstances. I was sick and tired of the conditioning of an upper ceiling of 45 cents, and that we should thank our lucky stars for Hanlong.

Maybe in August the 45 cents bid kept our share price reasonable. Many were calling that the share price would be 18 to 20 cents without Hanlong. That sounds feasible given the macro landscape at that time.

But things are quite different from August when investor mood & commodity prices were very depressed.

However, there are many still calling an 18 to 20 cents bottom without Hanlong. There is no recognition that the macro landscape has changed - the only thing that hasn't changed is tha Hanlong have been stalling and delaying and that it is one of the key factors in the current shaer price.

Surely you recognise that a mistrust of Hanlong is a major determinant in the current share price of 32 cents.

It is possibel that Hanlong could be holding the share price up, and it is possible that Hanlong could be holding the share price down.

I am not sure why you are so insistent on branding everyone stupid if they don't support your assessment.