911...what's your take...cont'd, page-15

Feeling the heat? No way Grahod. So I gave you a thumbs up. I agree I didn't provide a very good example. So yes in your cross hairs. :-)

Fact: All the jet fuel was burnt off soon after impact. Agree or else you're blind.

Fact: Jet fuel can't burn hot enough to melt steel.

Surmise: The minimal time the fuel took to burn off wasn't enough time to even weaken the steel.

You know what a raging bush fire is? Did you see a raging bushfire type flame inside the tower? I didn't. In fact with all the combustibles, I would have expected a raging fire to be licking out all the windows. Was it? No. Did you see flames like this?

http://www.lafire.com/famous_fires/1988-0504_1stInterstateFire/050488_InterstateFire.htm

Which funnily the building didn't collapse.

Pentagon video where confiscated from the Fuel station and hotels across the road with visual angles of the crash. Why have they not handed them back to the owners?

Scores of people saw a plane? Where are they on tape saying this? Missile? Who said a missile?

"Full of mistrust" - Well if you're so gullible with all the evidence I feel for your family.

Iraq = WMD? Lie.
Invasion of Iraq = Illegal.
Watergate
Oliver North
No Carbon Tax
UBL buried at sea. And now all those Team 6 members are dead. Yes a special forces member committed suicide. Really?

You see there are far more examples of government lies and FUD. Wikileaks exposed them even more.

Anxiety? ROFLOL

Oh your sig is great. Tell me why so many people believe in God? Your argument tell me you're a non believer.

"Emotional attachment blocks objectivity. Objectivity is a vital component to seeing something for what it really is. This is why fanatical conspiracy theorist are at a serious disadvantage, it's impossible to prove something not real.

Don't disappear. I'm quite prepared to be shown up as wrong. Proven wrong. I'm not emotionally attached. Just logical in forming an opinion with the evidence I've seen.