Rockist,
“If so, then there may be no need for PAX to raise more cash, although the funders may bargain to 40 or 50 % equity for their $30 mill in this example, leaving PAX shareholders worse off.”
Would it? PAX shareholders will be getting a stake in a geothermal project that is actually going to be built and generating a profit. How many geothermal companies listed on the ASX can claim that?
it is always darkest before the dawn, page-18
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)