Potts - I'll be happy when I read the quarterly - but even then I'm unsure if we'll have the clarity that I think we all want here.
The reason I say this is the last quarterly just had line items - no real accurate description.
Much like the email response Kiwi received - its still quite ambiguous - could it really kill him (PM) to simply respond "Yes - all stages of the exploration have been paid for".
The problem I see with management is starting to remind me of problems I often encounter in my industry when dealing with experts - their reports and communications often leave out the "basic" elements because they simply assume that it was obvious to all.
I think management need to do the "Is this clear to a 4 year old" exercise before they publish something for the market - they just need to make sure its simple, to the point, and easily understood.
So right this moment - we still really don't know the answer that 2 or 3 million dollar question unfortunately.
Kiwi - would it pushing your/our luck if you responded to PM if he could be a little more specific with whats been funded (i.e. have ALL costs been covered for the next 3-4 months exploration activities)??
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?