BB
"My rear end - it was only ever an amendment to their constitution. If it was so important, why didn't their forefathers think of it in the first place?"
...........................
The answer is rather that they wanted to make the right explicit rather than implicit, where it is easier to argue away later on when everyone has forgotten the reasons for it.
The fundamental reason for the right to bear arms is as an expression of the relationship of the individual to the state.
People long ago, who fought for the rights many of us take for granted(and are willing to piss them away for nothing)knew about human nature and how an armed citizenry is the ultimate equalizer against tyrannical government.
A disarmed citizenry invites arrogant government.
Read a bit of history and you see. Every feudal society disarms its proles, same with the Bolshiviks and similar.
cheers
- Forums
- General
- absolute right to bear arms?
absolute right to bear arms?, page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 74 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online