It will come down to whether or not there is sufficient belief that Iraq is storing biological and chemical supplies that they were supposed to have destroyed. There is no proof that they have been destroyed and there is growing belief that the UN will not find them. I sincerely hope that the US wait until there is sufficient support from the UN...but my money is on that they won't. I believe that what the US is attempting to do is better than the alternative but the manner in which they go about it could be divisive in the world community which could create the first stages of WW3. How much support could the US give little Oz if its own shores are being attacked? Iraq is the bad guy here...people seem to be losing sight of that because of the fear of war. Iraq have not complied with UN resolutions and no amount of 'prove it first' can change that. If the UN totatally supported what they know to be true then Saddam will exile and they can move on with a show of strength to the next problem. Did anyone find the answer to a question I asked a few days ago about what counties under the charter of the UN are permitted to have nuclear capabilities. As I said before I think it is 5 but could be wrong?
