blastoff tuesday, page-15

ozwire,

Both companies hold petroleum exploration licenses for their respective areas ... so your analogy is misleading IMHO.

... there must be a reason that they are all petroleum leases and not prospective for copper or gold or iron ore.

The BHP info appears inconclusive (no indication of what is north of the cross section on P11) and EDEs PEL region is shown on Linc's map.

50 x 200 klm is still a massive area and I'm not convinced that it's totally unrelated ...especially to the adjoining Linc's PEL 123.

Any success would completely change a micro-cap like EDE.

I'm curious about your motives to express a negative opinion with inconclusive information.

Why are they "Petroleum Exploration Licenses" if there is no possibility of "Petroleum to Explore". Do you know more than the exploration geos who issued the licenses ...are they fraudulent licenses?

Not the same as parking your yacht in Collins street.



SJB.

All IMHO