bill shorten, swan and gillard decided to take the small superfund money away from the superfunds, and put it into general revenue....all amounts under $2000
these amounts are from the lowest paid workers....and from the working mums....if you lose your job and no contributions are made in a year....it disappears....
into thin air
working mums, often have to give up work, as they take time off to have babies, raise their children...
so labor thought that was a great idea to snatch the money from them....unless they could afford to pay the money from their own funds as contributions, to keep the fund going...
why ???? I call it straight out thieving, and looting
what do you call it ? do you think it is fair ?
many people can only get part time or casual jobs on an ad hoc basis.....
so all the crap about how generous labor are, and how mean Abbott is, is simply rubbish
labor gives a tiny bit with one hand, then by a sleight of hand, takes 10 times that amount away with the other hand
I did not hear you complaining about labor taking all the low income workers superfund benefits, so gillard and swan could pretend they would have the budget in surplus
- Forums
- Political Debate
- cop that if you earn under $37000-superannua
cop that if you earn under $37000-superannua , page-9
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)