Bliss, I am not looking to start a posting war, but the concept that the J/V between BPT and ICN having a condition that the well "MUST" be commercial in order for BPT to be awarded their 40% interest, is simply uncommercial.
The answer to the issue is important, because ATP855 may prove to be worth heaps.
SO just to satisfy my curiousity, I went back and tried to find the terms under which the J/V was finally agreed.
No where in these terms does it state that BPT has to produce a successful/commercial well for BPT to be awarded their 40%.
If you can direct me to something to the contrary, I would be interested to have a read.
cheers
15 July 2011
ICON AND BEACH SETTLE ATP855P DISPUTE
Icon Energy Limited (ASX: ICN) and Beach Energy Limited (ASX: BPT) have resolved their dispute in relation to the prospective ATP855P tenement, and have agreed to work together under a Farmin Agreement executed today.
Under the terms of their agreement:
• The Federal Court proceedings will be discontinued;
• Icon has now transferred a 40% interest in ATP855P to Beach (subject to Ministerial approval);
• Beach will drill a horizontal pilot unconventional well into one of the strata comprising the Roseneath, Epsilon & Murteree sequence, then case and suspend the well, suitable for fracture stimulation, which is expected to occur within 30 days of rig release from the well;
• Beach will fund Icon’s share of the farmin operations at an estimated cost of $16 million (gross), with the exception of a $1.75 million contribution to be made by Icon;
• The cost of fracture stimulation, completing and flow testing the well will be paid by the Joint Venture parties in proportion to their Participating lnterest shares;
• Beach will be recommended by Icon to be the operator of the ATP855P permit;
• Icon will be recommended by Beach to undertake the management of coal seam gas operations in both ATP855P and PEL218 Post Permian Joint Ventures;
then ICN later say:
16 July 2012
BEACH AND ICON TO ACCELERATE DRILLING OF HALIFAX 1
The financial terms of the farm-in will be the equivalent of those agreed previously with Beach to retain its 40% assignment (to give Beach 60% of ATP 855P) after funding the first $16 million relating to Halifax-1, or until the cost of completion, less a $1.75 million contribution from Icon.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BPT
- bpt will loose jv 40% if no comgas in halifax
bpt will loose jv 40% if no comgas in halifax, page-15
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 21 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BPT (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
$1.11 |
Change
-0.025(2.21%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.520B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$1.13 | $1.14 | $1.09 | $9.538M | 8.626M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 94545 | $1.10 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$1.11 | 199949 | 8 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 90000 | 1.095 |
10 | 100211 | 1.090 |
1 | 20744 | 1.085 |
8 | 109058 | 1.080 |
4 | 34791 | 1.075 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.105 | 801 | 2 |
1.120 | 20744 | 1 |
1.125 | 21744 | 2 |
1.130 | 22744 | 2 |
1.135 | 20744 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 06/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
BPT (ASX) Chart |