sharman,
"Anatol and Crespo you are both right. Anatol is right that it provides further validation for the goldwyer. And Crespo is right in the fact that it doesnt change whats in the ground at all and thats all he is saying.""
Not true sharman. crespo made a foolish unqualified statement that he now fails to retract and ties himself in knots trying to now qualify it.
It is certainly not an argument over semantics as you claim.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?