where to now?, page-24

Lincoln Burrows, I don't think that haws' Chinese friends would play any part in what you are suggesting. I also think that the haw directors have had their fill of the Lcy team.
As I mentioned before I attended haws agm along with cobyau, And I understand that there was also a haw shareholder in attendance known to one of your shareholders.
At this agm it was mentioned in general discussion by one of the haw directors that the lcy team attended a joint venture meeting with a legal representative, without any prior warning. I would have thought this went down well with the haw team.
Also the looks on the haw directors faces when it became painfully obvious that lcy voted against every motion tendered.
When you also consider that lcy tried to derail a share purchase plan by delaying a report on Mt Bevan would hardly endear the haw directors to work with lcy on any new projects or joint ventures I would think.
Although I would think that haw would agree to postoning any further expenditure on Mt Bevan at this stage if the cannot mutually agree on a deal for Haws' 40% . Off course my opinion only.
Hope this helps.