Simply put, France is acting as a blocker to the USA and resolution of the M-E situation, out of 2 motives: 1) preservation and protection of its previous (and, quite possibly, continuing) military procurement relationship with Iraq; 2) avoidance of discovery of its role in equipping (or assisting Iraq to be equipped with the formative components of its WOMD programme); 3) protecting its own commercial and strategic interests in the region; and 4) oh, by the way, to advance its own deliberately laid out neo-colonialist aspirations in Africa.
At the very same time as France demands that the USA work within the United Nations system, France has in recent weeks systematically sent in troops (without UN sanction) to each of Sierra Leone, and then, into Ivory Coast.
Now, according to the ABC (this morning), France has boosted its Ivory Coast deployment.
Whilst the purposes of France's deployment can be linked to protecting French nationals (and assets), it also appears to have been linked to forcibly determining an outcome to the internal affairs of Ivory Coast.
It could be argued that President Laurent Gbagbo originally sought the supportof the French, but if that is so, then why are President Gbagbo's supporters now demonstrating against the French, and the French brokered peace plan which effectively hands control of Ivory Coast to the rebels?
Personally, I find none of this surpdrising, as the French have always been renowned for pursuing their own expansionist interests, whilst opposing resolution of issues in the M-E.
Perhaps it is time for the UN and for the Security Council to consider what France is doing in Africa?