Tin .................................. "A sceptic, IMO, looks at both sides of an argument and criticise both sides as required. You don't see much of that from faux sceptics." ..................................
Just the inevitable result of the structure here. Write short sharp posts and yell 'touche'. If we were all sitting in a pub or cafe for an afternoon discussing CAGW over coffees or beers of course the discussion would be completely different. Much more nuanced for a start, way less insulting and people couldn't get away with evasion like they do here. We all notice what gets answered and what doesn't. Whatever 'faux sceptics' are accused of applies equally to the warmists.
