Are you really that stupid. We were never discussing the "phylomer libraries" which are meaningless, anyways, which you apparently don't get. But we were discussing immunogenicity related to phylomers because they were between 30-40mers in size, and selected from bacteria and viral libraries. Enumerate's response was that they were not that big, but were 15-20mers. PYC has clearly stated that the phylomers they have identified in their discovery and collaboration programs averaged around 28mers for the 1st library and 40mers for the second library. These are the peptide candidates they are identifying, and these are the candidates that they are then trying to develop. Can you understand that simple concept??
Don't answer this post, cause I already know you don't get it and its over your head. If you want to try and impress other posters with some whitty comeback that is fine with me. But I can't rationally or logically argue with stupid.
PYC Price at posting:
2.2¢ Sentiment: Sell Disclosure: Not Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)