I personally disagree. I would say GGP has always been a very tight ship. Maybe too tight to the point we are blind. But communication has improved. It it were a leaky ship perhaps we wouldnt be in this position and the legals would be out in the open 12months ago.
I know I've never recieved any information that was material or insider. Yes, the company (recently) respond well to shareholder inquiries. But surely that is a positive, being able to call and talk to someone and actually have things answered. I don't think they should be criticised for it.
I've only every discussed legals, timelines, shareholdings, funding, etc with them. All of that information is/was available in prior announcements.
The main difference is the legals were more comprehensively disclosed in the prospectus, and the timelines are finally being met after many promises on fraccing.
I certainly don't believe it was "deliberate". Why would they gain by deliberately decieving?
It's a spec stock and most announcements have a million disclaimers. As investors we take on risk. At this end of market the risk is high. Sometimes things work out, sometimes they dont. Nobody wins in a blame game.
The biggest risk has always been funding risk imo. And that has only partially been addressed. Yes we've secured funding, but on it's own it is not a winner. Potentially very dilutive.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- GGP
- not long to go now
not long to go now, page-35
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 129 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)