topped up , page-33

lol bazza, if I irritate you - bad luck. People who cast stones should imo develop a thick skin lest others cast stones back.

It seems your strongest argument so far consists of calling me a clown - feel free to stick with that.

But let's return to your original post, from which you have now so profusely backpedalled, and see what it is you are now denying you inferred:

Firstly:

"you are suggesting to us that someone at ROC oil has furnished you with information"

"you are suggesting" - actually Auto stated that someone at ROC oil provided information in response to his questions. "you are suggesting" is a clear implication that what Auto said is not actualy true.

Secondly:

"I find the idea of ROC oil being prepared to give you that insight over the phone...interesting to put it mildly."

"interesting to put it mildly" - you put it mildly using the word "interesting", clearly implying something stronger than "interesting".

Thirdly:

"As this mythical person ay ROC oil..."

So this person that Auto stated he actualy contacted is "mythical", i.e. this person only exists in Auto's imagination or is a myth passed on by Auto.

Finally:

"tell us the name of this source so we can all have his ear Auto, because that certainly does not sound to me like the bland, uninformative stock answers one normally gets fed from inquisative phone call questions..."

If this last excerpt isnt expressing total disbelief in what Auto reported then my command of the english language is as bad as you suggest it is.

Fortunately, I'm comfortable and confident in my use and understanding of the english language, so my comments about your post stand.

Sharks.