topped up , page-34

Sharks
Don't worry. I do appreciate you defending but It's not worth the discussion. I wonder what Bazza expects happens when a analyst from a broking house meets with the company , that the company takes out the last 10 announcements and reads them back to the analyst . I am convinced Bazza does not make regular calls to companies he holds ( I always do ) and thus his view of how a conversation may go is very black and white. He may also fail to understand I am not calling a company out of the blue , I have been in contact with the company for over 2 years seeking to understand as much detail as I can on many matters . A similar process to conference calls when analysts ask detailed questions to understand things further.
I am going to for the sake of it explain the difference between a good answer and a bad one

Question - how are things progressing - BAU - same as last update to market
Good answer - yes , all progressing as expected
Bad answer - we will provide an update to the market in the quarterly report . Now the only way you can have the option of deciding is to ask the question to begin with.
Bazza - what peeves me off about your response is that it jeopardises relationships that I work to build , if I was the person at ROC, and was reading this and I am sure he would deduct who I am , I would think I really shouldn't be talking to that person - look how someone has suggested I may be giving inside info out . If you question any if it , , instead of attacking You should put me on ignore. Sharks has done a great job in pointing out the spirit of your accusations , amazingly in my eyes I truly see you as an inexperienced of uniformed fool for not only the initial post but the fact you continue to argue a case which only you see as valid