Hmmm "left leaning rags" like the Sydney Morning Herald...Come on snookums you'll have to do better than that. Your hypocricy seems to know no bounds. You challenge the bonafides of all references that are critical to your argument yet you post the most blatantly partisan rubbish and expect that all will believe it as gospel.
And I responded
Furthermore, many of the "rags" that quote him are just that, left leaning anti semitic rags of which people like yourself are the editors.
See the word “many”? I didn’t say “all”.
And even if the Sydney Morning Herald did post the article, I wouldn’t bring it under the banner of “many”, it would simply take a left leaning bored journo (with your warped sense of vision) working with that paper to post an article from CARE. That does not mean the paper endorses the article. What it does mean is that the journo unlike you, foolishly did not do his homework and research both CARE and Daniel Pipes.
You on the other hand knew full well the CARE id discredited yet you put it up as somewhat of an authority.
I posted Daniel Pipes rebuttal in it’s entirety.
I found the time.
And you then post…..” Your pathetic challenges to me are laughable. Do you really think I would take the time to do as you suggest and quote all of the full references. That could be a days work. And for what? Just to have you call me a liar again and weasel out by setting yet another ridiculous challenge.
I was spot on when I posted you would weasel out. You found the time and energy to post that nonsence in order to make my original thread look foolish………Well, find the time again or have you been well and truly SNOOKERED?......and yes I am calling you, again….a liar.
Just one question but this time a little honesty.
Are you a born liar or did you work at it till you thought you had refined the art?...........
