Been following this stock for a while now, and it appears, to me anyway, that the informal fallacies in which some information is being repeatedly restated regardless of contradiction, is causing many here deep anguish.
IMHO these fallacies are being restated by rampers and down rampers alike.
Here are some links to publicly available documentation in regards to initial production of the 6H(well 1) and 8A(Well 2) vertical permian basin wells. The decline curves of these wells clearly indicate that what some people here are expecting and repeatedly restating regardless of contradiction, proof by repeated assertion. A shame really.
Well 1 report W2 [379bopd & 328mcfd]
http://webapps.rrc.state.tx.us/CMPL/viewPdfReportFormAction.do?method=cmplW2FormPdf&packetSummaryId=64781
Well 2 report W2 [271bopd & 85mcfd]
http://webapps.rrc.state.tx.us/CMPL/viewPdfReportFormAction.do?method=cmplW2FormPdf&packetSummaryId=65110
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- GGP
- proof by assertion
proof by assertion
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 18 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
RNU
Renascor wins a funding boost given it wants to produce a critical mineral – but $5M award pales in comparison to some
SKS
SKS Technologies wins US$90M award to supply power to international hyperscale data centre in Melbourne